GOVERNMENT RECORD
Arizona Public Access case summary: S-1400-CV-202600973
About this source
Arizona Judicial Branch Public Access case lookup for Yuma County Superior Court case S-1400-CV-202600973, checked September 29, 2026. It supplies case-summary and activity metadata, not the complaint or official clerk case file.
- Source type
- Government record
- Source classification
- Primary source
- Source date
- Not established in the reviewed record
Relevant excerpt / notes
The portal identifies AG TECH, LLC as plaintiff and ROBERT TYLER WOODMAN (D1), THE LEMON GROVE, LLC (D3), and AMY WOODMAN (D4) as defendants. It lists filing on August 31, 2026; a complaint, arbitration certificate marked IS NOT, and summons entries on August 31; a plaintiff jury demand on September 1; and SERVICE: Certificate entries for D1, D3, and D4 on September 18. No disposition date or later activity was displayed at this check. The certificates themselves, actual service dates, complaint, pleadings, counsel, and merits are not established by this summary. The portal warns its data may be incomplete and is not the official court record. Search the exact case number at the linked portal.
Publisher / issuing organization 1
Related claims 2
- UnverifiedClaim under review: Was Woodman served before the lease announcement?
Arizona Public Access lists a September 18 SERVICE: Certificate entry for Robert Tyler Woodman, but the certificate was not reviewed. It does not establish when or how service occurred.
- UnverifiedClaim under review: What is established about the reported AgTech case number and filing dates?
Arizona Public Access confirms the reported case number, court, August 31 filing date, listed parties, and several docket entries. Complaint contents and actual service dates remain unverified.
Related articles 1
- ExplainerCourt Records Confirm AgTech Lawsuit Against Woodman, but Details Remain Unclear
Arizona’s Public Access lookup confirms the reported Yuma County Superior Court case number and August 31 complaint entry. It lists three defendants and later service-certificate entries, but the complaint and certificates remain unreviewed. Pleaded claims, actual service dates, and any outcome remain unverified.
Related topics 1
- Yuma Biosolids / AgTech
A source-first guide to Yuma’s biosolids debate: State Land leases, AgTech’s reported formal challenge, the City contract, fly research, PFAS questions and the records still needed.