CLAIM UNDER REVIEW
Claim under review: Was Woodman served before the lease announcement?
Arizona Public Access lists a September 18 SERVICE: Certificate entry for Robert Tyler Woodman, but the certificate was not reviewed. It does not establish when or how service occurred.
Assessment
The claim has not been established by the evidence reviewed.
This is an editorial assessment of the cited evidence, not a finding by a court or public authority.
Evidence summary
The Arizona Judicial Branch Public Access case activity lists a September 18, 2026 SERVICE: Certificate entry for D1, Robert Tyler Woodman. Arizona’s Family reported Woodman’s statement that he had been served shortly before the September 10 lease announcement, but the underlying certificate or return was not obtained. The portal entry date is not necessarily the service date. Filing, service, and reporting are distinct events.
What the evidence establishes
A service-certificate entry for Woodman appears in the public case activity on September 18, 2026.
What it does not establish
The entry does not establish the date, method, or legal sufficiency of service, and it cannot verify service before September 10. The news interview is Woodman’s reported account, not the return of service.
What remains unknown
The September 18 service certificate or return, summons, and official clerk record are needed to establish the actual service date and recipient.
Supporting sources 3
- Secondary source / research lead · OtherUnresolved research compilation: Woodman Claims and AgTech Lawsuit: Run One Investigative Report
This page documents an unresolved claim or research lead. It is not a finding of fact. UNRESOLVED. SECONDARY SOURCE ONLY. This is a cleaned catalog description of an internal research compilation, not independent corroboration of its contents. Authorship and issuing authority are not independently authenticated. The raw research PDF remains private.
- Secondary source / research lead · News reportArizona’s Family reports the AgTech lease decision
September 12, 2026 reporting describes the State decision and the surrounding complaints.
- Primary source · Government recordArizona Public Access case summary: S-1400-CV-202600973
Arizona Judicial Branch Public Access case lookup for Yuma County Superior Court case S-1400-CV-202600973, checked September 29, 2026. It supplies case-summary and activity metadata, not the complaint or official clerk case file.
Contradicting sources
No published contradicting sources are attached. This does not establish that none exist.
Related topics 1
- Yuma Biosolids / AgTech
A source-first guide to Yuma’s biosolids debate: State Land leases, AgTech’s reported formal challenge, the City contract, fly research, PFAS questions and the records still needed.