COURT FILING
United States v. Alba, 3:01-cr-03177-W, Document 1, filed10/17/01 — complaint/DEA affidavit
About this source
S246: A public RECAP copy of a federal complaint and affidavit.
- Publisher/custodian: U.S. District Court, Southern District of California; public RECAP reproduction. - Source date/status: 2001-10-17. - Prior review: 63 page pdf retrieved relevant pages visually verified. - Original deep link withheld from this public package where source privacy or authentication review is needed. Use the source title, custodian and source ID for attribution; no claim that the original is inaccessible to everyone.
Context in the linked claims: - The federal affidavit mentions an unidentified Carlos (Adams). - The affidavit's Carlos remains an unresolved comparison with the older name references.
- Source type
- Court filing
- Source classification
- Primary source
- Source date
Relevant excerpt / notes
Recorded affidavit allegations, not guilt, charges or a unique identity for Carlos (Adams); full raw complaint excluded pending privacy screening.
Publisher / issuing organization 1
Related claims 2
- UnverifiedCarlos (Adams) in the federal affidavit remains a possible/unresolved name match to the older Carlos research subjects; neither full name nor unique identifier establishes attribution.
The affidavit's Carlos remains an unresolved comparison with the older name references.
- VerifiedThe retrieved 2001 federal complaint/DEA affidavit mentions Carlos (Adams) in paragraph 27(a), describing an alleged 2001-03-29 intercepted conversation; the complaint defendant caption does not list Carlos.
The federal affidavit mentions an unidentified Carlos (Adams).
People 1
- Carlos (Adams) (2001 federal affidavit reference)
A 2001 federal affidavit mentions Carlos (Adams) in an account of an alleged intercepted call. The name remains unidentified and is absent from that complaint's defendant caption. The fragment establishes no charge, conviction, guilt or match to another Carlos.
Organizations 1
- U.S. District Court, Southern District of California
The federal court issued the complaint and the distinct 2013 revocation judgment represented by public copies. Affidavit allegations, the unidentified Carlos reference and the unavailable original 2003 disposition remain separate issues.