CLAIM UNDER REVIEW
The retrieved 2001 federal complaint/DEA affidavit mentions Carlos (Adams) in paragraph 27(a), describing an alleged 2001-03-29 intercepted conversation; the complaint defendant caption does not list Carlos.
The federal affidavit mentions an unidentified Carlos (Adams).
Assessment
The cited evidence establishes the claim as stated.
This is an editorial assessment of the cited evidence, not a finding by a court or public authority.
Evidence summary
S246: A public RECAP copy of a federal complaint and affidavit.
What the evidence establishes
The retrieved 2001 federal complaint/DEA affidavit mentions Carlos (Adams) in paragraph 27(a), describing an alleged 2001-03-29 intercepted conversation; the complaint defendant caption does not list Carlos.
What it does not establish
Verified document content only. The affiant account and interpretations are allegations, not proven conduct, charge, conviction or disposition for Carlos (P055)/Carlos Gil Adams Pereyra (P039)/Carlos G. Adams (P002). Exact fragment lacks middle name/DOB/spouse/property match. PDF filing header controls over conflicting RECAP item metadata. Recorded affidavit allegations, not guilt, charges or a unique identity for Carlos (Adams); full raw complaint excluded pending privacy screening.
What remains unknown
The name fragment supplies no unique identity, charge, conviction or disposition for a Carlos.
First seen
Supporting sources 1
- Primary source · Court filingUnited States v. Alba, 3:01-cr-03177-W, Document 1, filed10/17/01 — complaint/DEA affidavit
S246: A public RECAP copy of a federal complaint and affidavit. - Publisher/custodian: U.S. District Court, Southern District of California; public RECAP reproduction. - Source date/status: 2001-10-17. - Prior review: 63 page pdf retrieved relevant pages visually verified. - Original deep link withheld from this public package where source privacy or authentication review is needed. Use the source title, custodian and source ID for attribution; no claim that the original is inaccessible to everyone. Context in the linked claims: - The federal affidavit mentions an unidentified Carlos (Adams). - The affidavit's Carlos remains an unresolved comparison with the older name references.
Contradicting sources
No published contradicting sources are attached. This does not establish that none exist.
Sources 1
- Primary source · Court filingUnited States v. Alba, 3:01-cr-03177-W, Document 1, filed10/17/01 — complaint/DEA affidavit
S246: A public RECAP copy of a federal complaint and affidavit. - Publisher/custodian: U.S. District Court, Southern District of California; public RECAP reproduction. - Source date/status: 2001-10-17. - Prior review: 63 page pdf retrieved relevant pages visually verified. - Original deep link withheld from this public package where source privacy or authentication review is needed. Use the source title, custodian and source ID for attribution; no claim that the original is inaccessible to everyone. Context in the linked claims: - The federal affidavit mentions an unidentified Carlos (Adams). - The affidavit's Carlos remains an unresolved comparison with the older name references.
People 1
- Carlos (Adams) (2001 federal affidavit reference)
A 2001 federal affidavit mentions Carlos (Adams) in an account of an alleged intercepted call. The name remains unidentified and is absent from that complaint's defendant caption. The fragment establishes no charge, conviction, guilt or match to another Carlos.