YUMA, ARIZONALocal issues. Public records. Clear context.

SCIENTIFIC STUDY

National field study of PFAS after biosolids application

Updated

About this source

Ian Pepper and coauthors’ study in Science of the Total Environment; PubMed provides the authors’ abstract. Online December 19, 2025; issue January 15, 2026.

Source type
Scientific study
Source classification
Primary source
Source date

Relevant excerpt / notes

Producer: Study authors; bibliographic record hosted by the U.S. National Library of Medicine. Source class: Primary record or first-party statement. What it supports: Ian Pepper and coauthors’ study in Science of the Total Environment; PubMed provides the authors’ abstract. Online December 19, 2025; issue January 15, 2026. Limitations: Abstract-level review only. The sampled sites and soil-depth results cannot be transferred to AgTech or used to declare every groundwater pathway safe. Date: 2025-12-19. Reviewed September 19, 2026.

Related claims 3

Related articles 1

People 1

  • Ian Pepper

    Ian Pepper is a named author of the reviewed PFAS study abstracts and is quoted in the University of Arizona’s February 2026 account of biosolids research and Pima disposal costs. Research findings and cost statements have different evidentiary limits.

Related topics 1

  • Yuma Biosolids / AgTech

    A source-first guide to Yuma’s biosolids debate: the lease decision, City contract, fly research, PFAS questions and the records still needed.