YUMA, ARIZONALocal issues. Public records. Clear context.

SCIENTIFIC STUDY

Field study of PFAS in soils receiving Class B biosolids

Updated

About this source

Ian Pepper and coauthors’ 2021 study; PubMed supplies bibliographic information and the authors’ abstract. Online June 18, 2021; issue November 1, 2021.

Source type
Scientific study
Source classification
Primary source
Source date

Relevant excerpt / notes

Producer: Study authors; bibliographic record hosted by the U.S. National Library of Medicine. Source class: Primary record or first-party statement. What it supports: Ian Pepper and coauthors’ 2021 study; PubMed supplies bibliographic information and the authors’ abstract. Online June 18, 2021; issue November 1, 2021. Limitations: Abstract-level review, not a complete independent methods audit. Both biosolids and irrigation water were relevant in the study; local source attribution needs local evidence. Date: 2021-06-18. Reviewed September 19, 2026.

Related claims 3

Related articles 1

People 1

  • Ian Pepper

    Ian Pepper is a named author of the reviewed PFAS study abstracts and is quoted in the University of Arizona’s February 2026 account of biosolids research and Pima disposal costs. Research findings and cost statements have different evidentiary limits.

Related topics 1

  • Yuma Biosolids / AgTech

    A source-first guide to Yuma’s biosolids debate: the lease decision, City contract, fly research, PFAS questions and the records still needed.