YUMA, ARIZONAYuma news. Local context. Evidence you can check.

MEETING RECORD

City of Yuma, MC 2026-172, legislation details and report

Updated

About this source

City of Yuma Legistar record for Motion MC 2026-172, passed September 16, 2026. The motion authorizes City participation with Mohave, La Paz, and Yuma counties in litigation to enforce a 2024 federal district court judgment requiring an environmental impact statement for the proposed transfer of GSC Farm’s estimated consumptive use from 2,913.30 acre-feet of fourth-priority Colorado River entitlement to Queen Creek. The motion concerns that transfer and the existing judgment. It is separate from MC 2026-173, which concerns possible legal action over the Department of the Interior’s August 2026 operating decision. The record describes a $100,000 City cost cap.

Source type
Meeting record
Source classification
Primary source
Source date

Relevant excerpt / notes

Official City of Yuma Legistar record. Passed September 16, 2026. The motion describes authorization and scope; it does not establish the outcome of litigation.

Publisher / issuing organization 1

Timeline events 1

  • Yuma authorizes participation in litigation to enforce the Queen Creek transfer judgment (MC 2026-172)

    MC 2026-172 is marked Passed on September 16. It authorizes Yuma to participate with Mohave, La Paz, and Yuma counties in litigation seeking to enforce a 2024 federal district court judgment. The judgment required the Bureau of Reclamation to prepare an environmental impact statement concerning the proposed transfer to Queen Creek of the estimated consumptive use associated with GSC Farm’s 2,913.30 acre-foot fourth-priority Colorado River entitlement. This motion concerns that transfer and the existing judgment, not the Department of the Interior’s August 2026 operating decision addressed by MC 2026-173. The authorization does not establish the outcome of the litigation.

Related articles 1

Related topics 1

  • Colorado River Water & Yuma

    What federal Colorado River reductions mean for Yuma-area water holders, with evidence on priorities, planning, conservation and unresolved delivery decisions.