OTHER
Carlos Adams Facebook posts/comments:18WEBP captures supplied2026-10-09
About this source
S300: Supplied captures of public posts and comments.
- Publisher/custodian: Requester-saved Facebook captures. - Source date/status: Headers October4/6/7; year2026 requester-supplied; capture filenames2026-10-09. - Prior review: all18images visually reviewed original bytes and hashes retained. - Original deep link withheld from this public package where source privacy or authentication review is needed. Use the source title, custodian and source ID for attribution; no claim that the original is inaccessible to everyone. - Restricted raw evidence is not bundled. Personal locations, access codes, dependent identifiers and/or unrelated people may be present in the retained original. - A supplied account or prepared summary is evidence of what its author presented, not independent proof of the underlying events.
Context in the linked claims: - The capture displays a post reproducing a message identified as Dan's. - The captured caption alleges calls, offers and investigations without naming a coordinator. - The captured reply interprets “we” as a coordinated effort.
- Source type
- Other
- Source classification
- Secondary source / research lead
- Source date
- Not established in the reviewed record
Relevant excerpt / notes
Requester-supplied captures preserve displayed wording, not independently authenticated account/message origin. Visible month/day times lack a year/timezone; 2026 comes from requester context. Embedded-message participants/date and original permalinks remain unverified. Relative comment ages do not establish a complete chronology; the comments do not establish coordination or a formal campaign role.
Related claims 6
- Needs ContextCaptured October 6at 10:17AM post invites residents to weigh in on City ethics-commission proposal and submit believed experiences of misconduct for civic record of reported concerns.
The post invites reported experiences for an ethics-commission discussion.
- UnverifiedCaptured reply to Romas reads: he was most likely hired by a private investigator firm connected to a city official. That's my guess
The captured reply labels its private-investigator theory a guess.
- Needs ContextCaptured reply to Romas Vytas Kripaitis reads: yes, he used "we". So it's been a coordinated effort.
The captured reply interprets “we” as a coordinated effort.
- Needs ContextCaptured thread includes Romas questions, Marvin Thayer disengagement reminder/criticism, Romas good advice response, Brad Robloff opinion about repeated allegations and John Abarca comparison with Carlos insinuations.
The captured thread records reactions to the allegations.
- UnverifiedMain captured October 4 caption alleges calls/net-worth offers/investigations/contacts and says I won’t claim to know who coordinated what without evidence.
The captured caption alleges calls, offers and investigations without naming a coordinator.
- Needs ContextSupplied capture displays Carlos Adams post October 4at 1:25PM publishing a message requester identifies as Dan Bustard's; message says research finished/submitted to proper agencies and discussion ending.
The capture displays a post reproducing a message identified as Dan's.
Timeline events 2
- Captured post alleges scrutiny and reproduces a message identified as Dan's
The captured Carlos post displays October 4 at 1:25 PM. It contains allegations about scrutiny and reproduces the message Dan Bustard identifies as his own account of finishing the research and leaving the discussion. Year/timezone not visible; embedded 12:46PM lacks calendar/parties. Comment exact dates unknown. Not independently authenticated private transmission, coordination or agency knowledge. Precedes officialOct7 within requester-supported 2026context; no causal inference.
- Captured post invites ethics-commission feedback
The captured Carlos post displays October 6 at 10:17 AM. It invites feedback on an ethics commission and accounts of conduct residents believe involved official misconduct. Header omits year/timezone; no received complaints, adopted proposal or misconduct verified. No inferred link to same-day researcher email.