GOVERNMENT RECORD
O2026-032: Animals and Fowl staff report, October21,2026
About this source
Staff explanation of civil default, enforcement/resource rationale and intended welfare/reimbursement changes; not an empirical impact study.
- Source type
- Government record
- Source classification
- Primary source
- Source date
- Not established in the reviewed record
Relevant excerpt / notes
Staff explanation of civil default, enforcement/resource rationale and intended welfare/reimbursement changes; not an empirical impact study.
Related articles 1
- AnalysisYuma proposes banning outdoor dog tethering above 100 degrees
Yuma's proposed animal ordinance would make most violations $50 civil tickets instead of crimes. It would also add something the City doesn't really have now: clear rules against tethering dogs in the heat and against animal hoarding.